8 Comments

I had the same problem on abortion misinformation with Revista Proceso, the top news, politics, analysis monthly mag in México.

But on Scientific Comedy:

https://open.substack.com/pub/federicosotodelalba/p/sci-and-math-are-having-a-second?r=4up0lp

Expand full comment

NYT are bad faith actors

Expand full comment

Who owns NYT?

Expand full comment

So the NYT, for all the pomp, is really a cheap, lying tabloid.

Expand full comment

The author of the New York Times piece is a professor of SOCIOLOGY! Why would anyone be interested in her thoughts and opinions in the area of infectious disease epidemiology?

Expand full comment

Consider sending a copy of the Times editorial, plus this post, to the 100 US Senators who will advise and consent on Dr. Bhattacharya. And to Trump and JD Vance.

Expand full comment

This is the place in that Journal op-ed where "likely" appears in the context of an estimate of potential deaths: "It could make the difference between an epidemic that kills 20,000 and one that kills two million. If the number of actual infections is much larger than the number of cases—orders of magnitude larger—then the true fatality rate is much lower as well. That’s not only plausible but likely based on what we know so far."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-the-coronavirus-as-deadly-as-they-say-11585088464?page=1

Expand full comment

I used to subscribe to NY Times and the Washington Post. I don’t trust a word they are saying these days. It’s all lies and propaganda these days.

Life-long liberal here, ex-liberal now.

Expand full comment